Tous les Matins du Monde

We spent a lovely weekend at the beach with our friends, who have really become family — and due to a lucky aligning of the scheduling stars, were able to stay an extra night and drive back this morning.  My husband, the human traffic sensor, did not want to chance the morning rush hour, however, so we were on the road before six, when the world was still dark — speeding across the farmland of the Eastern Shore with the highway mostly to ourselves.

I started to think (because I couldn’t do much else at that hour) about how seldom I had had to wake that early.  5:30 is normal for a lot of people, including many of my students, who attend swim practice before school or face hourlong commutes from other states.  My own commute is walkable, and I’ve never had a homeroom, so the earliest I’ve had to face the world is several hours after they are up and running.  What a blessing, to wake with the sun or well after it!

Yet, as I watched the white fog settle in pillowy sheets on the flat fields, and the ghostly, dark forms of cattle moving among the newly-plowed grasses, I wondered at the beauty of the early morning that I almost, again, missed — and that was even before the sun started to rise.

A lot must depend on where you are in the world, I suppose.  When I lived in New York I would sometimes walk to church for a midweek Liturgy in the early morning, and the dark alleyways and still-drunk residents of the street seemed awfully sinister.  Even here in the suburbs, the most I could hope for would be the romantic drone of the trash truck or the shriek of school-bus brakes.  Maybe it’s just out in the wilderness where we can watch morning unfold as God intended it to.

A Tale of Two Portraits: Part II

Welcome to the new Teacher | Children | Well!

This painting also came to me without my asking for it.  The story is much shorter and simpler, though: one day after a service, a gentleman from our church approached me and said he’d liked the image of me looking down at the music from the chanter’s stand at the front of the church.  Could he take some photos and create a portrait?

I was honored, but not surprised: I’m used to extraordinary and undeserved blessings pouring over me every time I open my mouth in the sanctuary. They began the moment I started learning to chant and haven’t stopped since, growing in fact more intense, almost unbearable, over the years.

Like so many profound experiences, this one had a prosaic beginning: I was lonely.  After two years at a soul-sucking school, during which I hardly had time for basic grooming, I was suddenly thrust into a normal working schedule. From nine to five I worked at a corporate job, and from five to nine I sat at home and wondered what to do with myself and my life.  I went out a little, with new friends and dates, but mostly I missed my old life, even the incredible stress that had at least kept me busy.

There was a deeper struggle, too, about faith (why had I been through that?) and vocation (what would happen next?) And both began to come together when my dearest friend agreed to teach me to chant.  I had heard the ethereal Byzantine melodies over and over, their haunting cadences and complex truths driving themselves right through me, and I wanted to be able to sing them too.

The strange thing is that, really, I didn’t have a nice voice before I learned to chant.  I could sing on key, thanks to my piano training, but it wasn’t beautiful.  I am sometimes shocked, even now, when I hear recordings of myself: who is that person? I wonder.  It is certainly not me; I could never do that.  And when I look at this portrait, I have a similar feeling – she is not me at all, but the person I wish I were, graceful, humble, consumed by infinite love.  I become her for fleeting snatches of time when I am wrapped in the beauty and power of an ancient hymn.  John caught her for a moment, but by the time I looked up, she was gone.

Only by forgetting ourselves can we ever become who we were created to be.  I find this in music, in art, and in this lowly space, where I plug away at the daunting task of expression because it is so intoxicating, every once in awhile, to have done it well.  Having just completed five hundred entries here, I wanted to celebrate with something new that would inspire me to continue creating; and in this portrait, I think I have found it.

A Tale of Two Portraits: Part I

It was the year we had nothing to worry about.  The Year of the Millenium: the year we spent in triumph, between our fear of an electronic meltdown and our fear of a new, unknown threat that would dominate our collective consciousness for at least the next decade.

It was also my last year as a teenager, so of course there were things that could have worried me.  Myself, as per the teenage psyche, and the particulars of my situation. I had left a soft-of boyfriend behind and had plenty of offers in this romantic new kingdom by the sea.  Eventually, of course, the summer would end, and I would have more worries: a semester at a new and different school, hundreds of miles from the tentative friendships I’d formed in my first disastrous turn as a college student.

I didn’t worry, though.  I ate a lot that summer, my first departure from my thin days in Manhattan. Everything was delicious: fresh tomatoes and cucumbers dripping with olive oil, creamy yogurt with sun-ripened fruit or garlicky dill, and the fish — especially the fish, who came to the table dressed in grill marks and lemon or fried crisply, their tiny bodies cracking easily open to reveal a delicate backbone, salty from their morning in the ocean and warm from their recent trip to the deep-fryer.

I drank, too, though never to excess, still tentatively enjoying this freedom.  White table wine, mostly, from the northwest corner of the country and over the border.  The only bar drink I knew how to order: Johnnie Walker Red, on the rocks.  Orange Fanta, lighter and less sweet than I had tasted at home, and rich, dark coffee, stopping just before the sludge at the bottom.

I got a lot of what the natives called “sun therapy,” a translation I loved for its simple logic. When the thermometer climbed above 100, I tried to remember all those nights I had trudged home from the studio in freezing despair, and I stepped out of the shade and spread my arms wide to receive as much heat and light as the therapist would give, hoping it would undo all the rest, too.  I wore tops and dresses without sleeves, and I grew dark enough to pass for a native until I opened my mouth and spilled out broken phrases.  So I favored mysterious silence, unless pressed for an answer.  I smiled a lot.

I spent a lot of time thinking: about what I would do for the day, the summer, the rest of my life.  I rode a lot of buses, but I didn’t read: I watched the people on the buses and outside on the street.  I read at home, works from a strange bookshelf.  I spent several weeks sick in bed with a mysterious fever that hung on tenaciously, and just when (maybe because) I finally decided I was going out anyway, it disappeared.

I saw everything that summer.  In the epicenter of ancient civilization, even the subway tunnels held artifacts, and museums were choked with unorganized displays, piles upon piles of treasures made cheap by their sheer volume.  The churches on every corner were like museums themselves, but with a much more familiar feel: the faces on the walls and the melodies floating through the air felt like old friends, and I often went inside just to light a candle and be still, as much as my mind would allow.

So it was that I found myself, later that summer, on a cruise of the islands with two women I hardly knew at all. They were friends of my host; we decided to travel together out of convenience, but we connected instantly in the world of beaches and crumbling cities, gaudy evening entertainment and nights when the ocean rocked us gently to sleep.

One island visit found us at a church on Sunday morning.  Not just any church: a cave with a three-fold crack in the ceiling where the voice of God had entered and delivered the wildest and most fantastic of dreams.  We sat on tiny, hard benches and listened to part of Matins, but our time was short and we had to steal away after the Evlogetaria and before we wanted to.

On our way out, I spied a doorway and asked Marianne to take my picture there. It was easily a hundred degrees, but I still wore my sweater and long skirt from my trip to the church.  I took off my sunglasses for a moment, so they wouldn’t mar the photo, but the strong morning sun reflected off the dazzling whiteness of the walls around us and nearly blinded me.  I looked down, my eyes almost closed.  My skirt ruffled in the sea breeze.

Marianne snapped the photo, gave the camera back to me, and we hurried on. That was all, but when we returned to the mainland and I saw the picture, I was transfixed by her composition, by the light and holiness of that place.  I posted it on what I suppose was my first blog, a free site where I had written a few journal entries about my travels for family and friends to read.  Everyone loved it, and when Marianne left for home a few days later I sent her the address so we could keep in touch.

There were several more months of those days, months filled with the same thoughts and scenes and dinners and Liturgies and late-night conversations with the dear friends who were so kind to host me for so long.  I had lived alone in a strange city before, but this was the summer I really grew up, and I was especially sorry to see it end.

At home, I struggled to re-adjust to modern American life, with its twin gods of individualism and instant gratification.  I went back to school, and back to work, where I met a man I liked.  Six months later, I thought, “This might be it.”  Six months after that, it was.

Marianne and I did write each other sporadically, and a few months after my wedding I sent word that I was coming to Queens for a day to see the temporary MoMA.  I wanted to have lunch with her; I requested a Greek restaurant for old times’ sake, and when I arrived with my mom she was already there, in a chair against the wall.  We ate and drank and laughed as before, the conversation plunging instantly below the surface and into the depths.

As we picked at our yogurt and honey, she slid an envelope across the table, and a small package.  I opened both: a sweetly heartfelt expression of congratulations and a CD of her musician husband’s latest work.  “Thank you,” I said, touched at her thoughtfulness.  “There’s one more thing,” she said.  “I’m sorry I couldn’t be at your wedding, but there was something I thought you might like to have.”

She moved aside, and I saw for the first time the bulky package, wrapped in a black trash bag.  With some difficulty, she passed it to me, and I pulled the top down a couple of inches.  A few vertical lines; shades of white, gray and brown.  I knew instantly.  Still, I gasped when I saw the whole image.  We both did.  The waiter rushed over, alarmed, and stood as stunned as we were.

I don’t remember how I thanked her.  How could I have thanked her?  It was more than just the most valuable piece of art I’d ever owned, or the most personal gift I’d ever received.  It was the eternal gift of a moment that had meant so much more to me than I could ever have expressed in words.  With characteristic calmness, she explained simply that she’d liked the photo, and from my credit on the website remembered it was her composition, so she felt free to paint it.  And once it was finished, she’d thought it really belonged to me.

If you’ve been to my house, you know the portrait hangs next to my piano.  I’ve never framed it; I’ve hardly dared to touch it for fear it might disappear back into a dream again.  Even now, there is hardly a guest who doesn’t ask about it with awe, and every now and then it catches me off guard, my own face in the midst of an image that can bring that whole summer rushing back in a moment.

The Longest Day

It’s the longest day of the year, I remember suddenly, and boy, does it feel like it.

I am driving home from class; Stevie Nicks is wailing away on the stereo.  I am bawling, though I am not quite sure why.

For some aggravatingly unknown reason, I work much better under pressure than without it.  Thus the lazy shopping trip this morning, the e-mail exchange with my faraway sister, the heartwarming chat with the school principal when I dropped by with an early dinner for the staff… and then the frenzied consumption of 67 pages of textbook reading in hurried snatches between lessons for the remainder of the afternoon.  Sigh.

I’d read the chapter on ADHD (the shortest of the three, and it took me the longest – just reading about distractibility is enough to distract me!) and so launched into the one about emotional and behavioral disorders.  These are some of the most challenging students to teach, and they have some of the lowest rates of success in school, work and life.  They tend to run into trouble with law enforcement, teen pregnancy and substance abuse.  Absorb.  Absorb.  Highlight. Memorize.  Prepare for the quiz.

It wasn’t too hard, and afterward the instructor presented a [well-organized, thorough and informative] PowerPoint lecture about the chapter we’d just read. Then she started telling stories.  Like:

  • A child tattles on his friend: “So-and-so just pimp-slapped me!” The teacher responds: “That’s not appropriate; we don’t say ‘pimp’ at school.” Child is puzzled. “Pimp’s not a bad man; pimp’s a rich man!”
  • Teacher gives an assignment: write a letter to your parents. In it, try to persuade them to do something: anything you want. The child asks his family to please clean the house.
  • Child is showing signs of emotional disturbance; in a conference, teacher finds out parents have been taking child to a strip bar.
  • Staff remove a child who is throwing a tantrum from the classroom and place him in the “quiet room,” where he can calm down without hurting himself. He proceeds to run around the room yelling “gangbang!” and then demonstrate precisely what he means by that term.
  • When physically restrained by her teacher, a child does what she has learned to do to escape such situations: urinate on both of them.

Somehow, I remained clinically detached from these harrowing stories. I asked questions, took notes, commented when appropriate.

I didn’t even feel sad, really, until my friend Rebecca exploded with: “Can’t we just start a boarding school somewhere and take these children there and give them what their parents can’t?  Feed them, clothe them, discipline them, show them affection, help them succeed?  They can have their kids back on the weekends.  I think it’s important for them to be with their parents.  But… someone has to do something!”

“Do it.  I’ll work for you,” I said.  I meant it more than anything I’d said in at least a month.

And then, after watching this extremely disturbing promo for a documentary on eating disorders (an internalized form of emotional disability,) another friend mused: “It seems so sad, so extreme, and yet we are so much closer to those girls than we realize.  Life is hard, and people have to deal with it somehow; we all have different coping mechanisms.  Mine might not be as unhealthy as starving myself to death, but just a little change in the way my brain was wired, and –” she couldn’t finish her sentence.

We finish our wrap-up activity, walk to the parking lot, smelling the rain and chattering about the next day.  I start the car, turn on the radio for some reason. Then Stevie.  Then the tears.  I think, over and over: it’s not fair.

None of it is fair.  Nor has it ever been.

A Bit Bitey

My loyal readers know that I've been writing for Patch for several months now: I have a handful of articles about local food under the title Neighborhood Nourishment.

Starting last month, Patch expanded my column to include some pieces under the title Bites Nearby.  They stop just short of restaurant reviews, and I think they're much more useful; instead of my opinions and grievances (The fries were too soggy! The caprese was impeccable!) it's simply a bulleted list of important points about the establishment, followed by some more in-depth information about owner, chef and ideology.  We're hoping they will help convince Catonsville residents to patronize local eateries more often.

So far, there are three, all from BYOB restaurants with quirky menus and classy dishes.  If you're in the area, come have a bite!  I'll be happy to join you.

Consumed

I have profaned myself with coarse sins and consumed my whole life with procrastination. (Lenten Troparia of Orthros)

Yep, that's me.  I have an almost-final exam on Wednesday and a list of 85 terms to learn before I take it.  I have about 60 defined and a couple dozen learned.  And what am I doing?  Procrastinating Blogging.

But this is important!  I think I'm onto something.  Deductive reasoning moves from general to specific, right? Starting with basic rules (children are more squirrelly on Friday than any other day) and moving logically to a conclusion (I will never teach another piano lesson on a Friday.)  Inductive, meanwhile, goes from specific to general; it begins with observation (Maia is always waiting at the door when Rob pulls up) and moves to universals (cats must have very sensitive hearing.)

I have ten students in my Creative Writing class, and I think I can categorize them all as Deductive or Inductive writers.  Deductive writers enjoy a very vague prompt ("Write a story about rain") from which they begin to construct specific characters, setting and plot.  Inductive writers prefer something very specific ("Begin a story with the following quote: 'I can't believe you stole those flowers!'") around which they can build generalities of time and place.

Personally, I am firmly in the former camp.  I always found those detailed prompts trite and constraining.  But after assigning the flower prompt, I was shocked to read half a dozen fascinating and completely different accounts of stolen foliage and its subsequent denoument.

Back to work, that is, unless someone wants to further distract me with a response . . .

A Cautionary Tale

This story landed in my inbox shortly after it broke last week, and I've been sitting on it since then.  I suppose it's time to end my silence.

In a way, there's not much to say about it.  A teacher starts a personal blog, in which she lambasts her students in vindictive and vulgar terms.  A student discovers it.  Word spreads.  She is suspended for her actions, which she defends.  Public outcry is divided between supporters who believe kids really are as awful as she says, and a seething mob of parents demanding her head on a platter.  Much like any other celebrity scandal, minus the celebrity.

In another way, there's a lot to say -- perhaps more than can ever be said.  From the beginning, I've felt nothing but sadness about the whole situation, starting with the fact that, as a teacher, she is probably preaching the digital responsibility she's failed to model by including her name and location on the vitriolic posts that will most likely get her fired.  This is ironic, yes, but also (more so) sad.  Sad for her, and for her students.

It's sad that, although she obviously enjoys some aspects of her job (in one post, she congratulates herself for "kicking ass" by successfully instructing both gifted and remedial students in the same day) she has failed in many ways: to motivate them, to inspire them, to take charge of them.  Doing so is, undoubtedly, extraordinarily difficult.  Many days I fail at all three, myself.  It's sad that this failure made her angry at their indifference instead of determined to break through it.

Most sad of all were the comments left on her blog in the few hours between the students' discovery of it and her removal of the posts from the Web.  They displayed even more anger and vulgarity, denouncing her in crude terms, saying all kinds of nasty things about her and generally behaving like children. Which they are, still. Their words are reminiscent of preschool huffiness: "That's not FAIR!" and "You're not my FRIEND anymore!" with slightly different words.  Yet she is an adult, and she started this battle -- not directly, but deliberately, and it's sad that she felt she had no other option than to shout her anger at the world.

One comment stuck out to me above all the others: a student who said he had not hated the teacher "like all the rest" until he read what she had written.  His tone was so obviously injured that it struck a nerve.  Just like the first time we see a teacher outside of school and realize with shock that she is an actual person with a life and a family and feelings, he realized that teachers could be cruel, and that they didn't always act in the student's best interest.  They are, at the core, embarrassingly human.  And while I know it's best that he learn this now, the loss of innocence is still a loss, and it breaks my heart.

It may seem naive to hope for some good yet out of this awful situation, but that's where I am.  It doesn't look promising: probably a protracted legal battle will ensue, followed by an out-of-court settlement and / or a book deal.  The teacher has continued to post on a new website, saying things that are actually quite lucid and laudable (this post, demanding that teachers receive more public credibility, is a good example) but they still don't erase the insults she spewed at the world when she thought no one was listening.  Then again, I suppose it's possible that she hoped they were.

Now might be a good time to remind you of my privacy policy, and to share something I read on Dooce back when I first started blogging: when you write about someone on the Internet, you must be certain that your subject will one day read what you have written, and that that day will be sooner than you think.  It's true that I haven't directly told anyone at school about my blog, and for various reasons I'd be fine if it stayed that way (I'd hate to think that people would filter what they said to me for fear I might blog about it, for example.)  But if I were "outed" tomorrow, I'd be okay with that.  What I've said here is my own experience, for better or for worse; I've tried to be fair and positive about my thoughts and actions, and I think I've done that.  God forgive me if the truth is otherwise.

Why Writing Matters

When my principal sent me this article and asked for my comments, I knew it was major: I can't remember her ever doing that before.  So I read carefully.

At first glance, author Trip Gabriel seems merely bitter about the weight of the personal essay in college admissions decisions:
It was a theme I was to hear many, many times in more than a dozen campus visits. The personal essay, they all said, growing soft and fuzzy, is the one element where a student’s own voice can be heard through the fog of quantitative data.

[Later:]

Is this really fair? Certainly some students will succeed in writing wonderful essays. But mostly this will be because of natural talent or dubious outside help.

This isn't surprising, considering he has a very personal stake in this issue: twins who are set to attend college next year.  ("There wasn’t a vacation day in the next eight months that one of us didn’t spend on a college campus, somewhere.")

Nevertheless, it started to rankle me when he implied that the essay shouldn't be more important than teacher recommendations and extracurricular activities, and should come nowhere near the sacred four digits of the SAT score.

Look: most important are good grades in a tough program.  No one disputes that.  And standardized test scores do help to validate a student's performance and make a "first round" of cuts; together, these two elements help ensure that a student, if admitted, will feel comfortable in classes and on campus, neither too intellectual nor too oafish for the general population.

But that's not enough when students are applying to seven and eight colleges each.  The number of applicants is sky-high, and their credentials artificially inflated, since even the brightest students apply to four or five "safety schools."  Gabriel admits this freely through interviews with admissions counselors.  So what should a college do when presented with a glut of highly-qualified applicants?

a) Rely on a half-page letter dashed off by a teacher or coach who likes the student and can say some positive things about her.

b) Look at the number of self-reported hours a student has spent in debate, track, SADD and / or the school newspaper.

c) Listen to the student's own voice to get a feel for who she is and whether she would be a good fit for the school.

To me, it's crystal-clear that the first two choices, while they should be considered, come nowhere near as close as the third to the student herself.  In fact, I think the personal statement (I dislike the term "application essay" because of the mentality in which it places most students, even the creatively-minded ones) is preferable to the old tradition of an interview: students have a chance to reflect on the question, seek the advice of friends and family, and craft something that is self-aware, analytical and critically sound.

Sure, some will be more mature than others, but the immature ones can shine just as brightly.  And regardless of career choice, the ability to speak intelligently and positively about yourself to others is one worth taking some time to hone.  Unless, of course, you plan to become an ascetic.

Toot, Toot

I'm a little proud of this piece I wrote for Patch, so I'm going to send you there to read about one of my most unusual subjects of all time.

Speaking of Patch, it hosted an open house at Atwater's yesterday afternoon (yes, this Atwater's) and I discovered the best drink of all time.  They called it Belgian Coffee: half coffee, half organic eggnog.  Served warm in mugs.  Oh, my goodness.  Literally.

Inner Poet, Awake!

Or so I said to myself after reading a batch of my students' sestinas this morning.  They were so powerful I couldn't resist trying one myself, though poetry is not my favorite thing to write.

The fun part is that sestinas practically write themselves.  It's a great exercise to do with anyone who says they aren't creative (and if this includes yourself, so much the better!)

Start with six key words.  Here are mine:

  • dress

  • plant

  • open

  • fringe

  • fence

  • second


You can use any words, but if you take some time to think of good ones, it will be that much easier to write.  Look for connections: a fence can be built at the fringe of a yard, or fringe can trim a dress. Also, look for double meanings and flexible forms; plant could be a verb or noun, metaphorical (a spy) or literal (a philodendron.)

Now write six lines, each ending with one of your key words:
He pauses to stroke the satin of her fanciest dress
Laid out on the bed, next to the thirsty plant
That earnestly strains its tendrils toward the open
Window.  His fingers weave in and out of the fringe
As he calls to her, his eyes fixed outside at the fence.
“I’ll be right out,” she says. “Just a second.”

Here's where it gets tricky, but only for a minute.  Number the lines of your first stanza, and then rearrange your key words in the following pattern: 6-1-5-2-4-3.  Like so:

  • second

  • dress

  • fence

  • plant

  • fringe

  • open


Now write six more lines, ending with your key words in the new order:
So he sits, watching the fleecy clouds as the second
Hand ticks away the time, waits for her to dress
And walk outside with him, past the fence.
He wonders idly when they will be able to replant
The newly-turned soil across the stream, at the fringe
Of the property.  Then the door is open.

Continue this for four more stanzas, so that every key word appears in a different line.  Then, at the end, use all six words in only three lines.  It's interesting to see where the poem takes you; I certainly didn't start out with this in mind!
He can always tell when it’s her flinging open
The door; the pictures rattle, and for a second
He thinks a train is passing on the fringe
Of the town.  But, no: it’s her way to address
Every object in her path with conviction, to firmly plant
Herself at the center, and never on the fence.

She enters the room easily, her smile destroying the fence
Around his heart, leaving it free and open.
He can’t believe she would purposely supplant
His grief with joy, but he knows the second
Emotion is unavoidable when she wears that dress;
It radiates from the straps all the way to the fringe.

He loves the way the wisps of her hair fringe
Her face like a fur-lined coat, as if there were a fence
Of cold stones around her, and not just a summer dress.
Her eyes are closed as he strokes her hair, then snap open
When she hears the insistent telephone a second
Time, or maybe a third.  “Did you remember the plant?”

“Yes.”  It had been awful before to imagine a plant
Instead of her, sitting forlornly at the fringe
Of the room; but now it feels right, a close second
To an actual person, a small but stubborn defense.
Against his will, the floodgates of his soul swing open;
He reaches for her and crushes his anguish into her dress.

There is no way to fence in sorrow, or erase it in a second.
They know this; each tries to plant the idea on the fringe
Of the other’s mind.  She smoothes her dress and pushes the door open.