My New Favorite Brazilian Revolutionary

Dialogue cannot exist without humility.  The naming of the world, through which people constantly re-create that world, cannot be an act of arrogance.  Dialogue, as the encounter of those addressed to the common task of learning and acting, is broken if the parties (or one of them) lack humility.  How can I dialogue if I always project ignorance onto others and never perceive my own?  How can I dialogue if I regard myself as a case apart from others — mere “its” in whom I cannot recognize other “I”s?  How can I dialogue if I consider myself a member of the in-group of “pure” men, the owners of truth and knowledge, for whom all non-members are “these people” or “the great unwashed”? How can I dialogue if I start from the premise that naming the world is the task of an elite and that the presence of the people in histosy is a sign of deterioration thus to be avoided?  How can I dialogue if I am closed to — and even offended by — the contribution of others? How can I dialogue if I am afraid of being displaced, the mere possibility causing me torment and weakness? Self-sufficiency is incompatible with dialogue.  Men and women who lack humility (or have lost it) cannot come to the people, cannot be their partners in naming the world.  Someone who cannot acknowledge himself to be as mortal as everyone else still has a long way to go before he can reach the point of encounter. At the point of encounter there are neither utter ignoramuses nor perfect sages; there are only people who are attempting, together, to learn more than they now know.

Paolo Friere, Pedagogy of the Oppressed